Does the title suggest an informative post on questionable practices in the trading world, or is this just a shameless attempt to promote a penny stock blog? You make the call.
First of all, a short sale is the sale of a stock you do not own. If an investor believes the price will fall, he will “borrow” shares and immediately sell them in a short sale. If the stock price does decline, the investor buys shares back on the open market to replace the borrowed shares. Since the price is lower, the investor profits on the difference. If the price goes up, the investor loses money. Yes, you can make money when a stock declines in price. This is completely legal unless short sales are used to manipulate the price of a stock. Who would want to do something like that anyway?
Before you go out and start shorting everything in sight, remember that a stock can only fall to zero. In short selling you make money on the way down and lose money on the way up. Theoretically a stock can keep rising indefinitely. The potential for huge losses is great unless stops are put in place.
As for a ‘naked’ short sale, the seller does not borrow the securities in time to make delivery to the buyer within the standard three day settlement period. As a result, the seller fails to deliver securities to the buyer when delivery is due. This known as a ‘failure to deliver’ or ‘fail’. Simply put, the seller is given the opportunity to borrow shares that are not really available to borrow. This is not necessarily a violation of SEC rules or federal security laws. It can be argued that naked short selling contributes to market liquidity. It may take a market maker considerable time to arrange to borrow the security, and in a fast moving market, the market maker may need to sell the security short without having arranged to borrow shares. Illiquid, thinly traded stocks such as those traded on the OTCBB are susceptible to this practice as there may be few shares available to purchase or borrow at times.
Quazimoto says live and let live. Price swings in either direction, even if caused by naked short selling, create profitable opportunities. I’ll stay neutral by not reminding Quazi that even if he held all shares of one stock today, trading of these shares, because of naked short selling, could continue days afterward.
This type of practice makes me question the legality of printing some twenty dollar bills on the Bizhub.


